The article began by describing a fitness instructor leading an exercise class. The fitness instructor must realize that each participant is at a different skill level of strength and conditioning and then provide an experience that challenges each participant based on their own personal level. After all of our discussion on differentiation, this jumped out at me immediately as an analogy for differentiation. As classroom teachers, each of our students will walk through the door on the first day of school with a wide range of educational strengths and weaknesses and it is our job to find ways to challenge each student.
The article defines differentiated instruction as "instructional planning based on content, process, and product." Typically we plan lessons where we teach or share content with our students and ask them to create a product to practice and demonstrate their learning, but we leave out the "most important element in the learning equation; process."
"What do we do about this? How can we allow our students to process learning? How do I plan for processing?"
These are all questions that popped into mind (and hopefully yours) when you read this. It is really quite simple. If we are teaching content for 30 minutes we should allow three to four carefully, thought out, pauses during that time for students to reflect on what has been said. During this time students should be encouraged to reflect and share what they have gained from the teaching and what is still foggy. This allows the teacher to answer questions and provide the support for understanding before moving on to the next piece. These pauses should last from one to five minutes and should be enough time for students to truly process what they have just heard. The article suggests that this think time could take place in the form of silent reflection, journaling, or partner conversation.
The article also suggested using tech tools such as Plickers, Kahoot!, or Poll Everywhere to provide a short, immediate check-in response to see areas that students may need extra support.
I found this article really made me think and again tied in to our differentiation discussion as well as my PDP goal of technology integration. I feel that this article pushed me to reflect on my practice (NCTCS #5) as well as showed me how to facilitate the learning and understanding of my students (NCTCS #4).
The article also contained a link for tech suggestions with differentiation that I will definitely be checking out!
http://www.edutopia.org/blog/diverse-learners-process-their-understanding-john-mccarthy?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=socialflow%20&utm_campaign=Scholastic